I’ve posted the webinar presentation I gave for the Amigos Library Council on Slideshare at http://www.slideshare.net/davidshumaker/librarians-andmoo-csamigos7nov2013slideshare . Comments are welcome — let me know what you think!
Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
Next Thursday, Nov. 7, I’ll be participating in a webinar, “MOOCs, Mobile Technologies – Their Impact on Reference Service”, organized by the Amigos Library Council. My topic will be “Embedded Librarians: Building Relationships in a Massively Open Educational System.” It’s been an interesting topic to prepare for, and I’m looking forward to some good dialogue with the audience. I’m told there are still a few seats available, so if you’re interested, you can still register. Hope to see you there!
(Updated October 30)
The link to the “Inside Embedded Librarianship” webinar has been restored! Both the recording and the slides are available via links on the SLA Education Division website at http://education.sla.org/embedded-librarianship-webinar-resources/ . Thanks to Lesley Farmer and the SLA Education Division leadership for intervening to get access restored.
Sorry for the late posting on this. Simply an oversight on my part.
In a few hours, I’ll be presenting a webinar, entitled “Inside Embedded Librarianship,” for the SLA Education Division. Time is Friday, Oct. 11, at 1:30 p.m. US Eastern time. (I’m posting on Friday at about 10:00 a.m. US Eastern.)
We’ll review the essential characteristics of embedded librarianship, explore key trends, share practices of successful embedded librarians, and have time left over for questions. It’s free and open to all and (as of now) there’s still time to register.
Register at: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/121949849
In case you don’t see this in time or have a schedule conflict, I understand that the Education Division plans to make the recording available. I’ll post the link when I have it.
By the way, I’ve posted my presentation (co-authored with Matt Foley) to the Australian Law Librarians’ Association at http://www.slideshare.net/davidshumaker/audacious-goalsalla2013pdf .
I hope non-law librarians will enjoy it too!
I recently returned from Australia, where I participated in the annual conference of the Australian Law Librarians’ Association in Sydney. It was a rich learning experience, and a lot of fun. I look forward to keeping in touch with the new friends I made.
After the conference, I also had the opportunity to visit Macquarie University, where I met with Mary Simons, the embedded librarian in the Australian School of Advanced Medicine. (See Mary’s paper “Time to rethink the role of the library in educating doctors: Driving information literacy in the clinical environment” (Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100(4), 291-296. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.011) for insights into her work.)
At lunch with members of the library staff, I learned a subtle but important distinction between Australian and American use of the term “shout” that Americans would do well to keep in mind. Where in the U.S. we’ve come to use “shout out” as slang for “recognize” or “acknowledge” (as in the title of this post, which means, “An Acknowledgment to My Friends in Australia”), it turns out that in Australia, to “shout” for someone is to pay for = to pick up the check. So, Americans, when in Australia beware of “shouting out” to your friends — or you may find yourself stuck with the tab for everybody in the pub!
(p.s. to my friends in Australia: I’ll definitely “shout” for a round next time I visit — and I hope it will be soon!)
This post is inspired by an article I read recently in the March 2013 issue of the Harvard Business Review. (I’m always behind in my reading…)
The article is “The Case for Stealth Innovation” by Paddy Miller and Thomas Wedell-Wedellsborg. The authors discuss the advantages and requirements for introducing innovations quietly, not attracting senior management attention until the innovation is well established, “flying under the radar.” While the stealthy approach has its requirements, like finding allies who will support you, it avoids the possibility that by seeking permission, you’ll receive a premature “no” from an executive who doesn’t “get” your proposal.
The stealthy approach resonates with the challenges of initiating embedded librarianship. In the organizations I’ve studied, there are some that have taken the non-stealthy approach, and others that have employed a more bottom-up strategy. To be sure, there are cases in which senior executives push the librarian into an embedded role. That’s great, if the boss is alert and understands the opportunity for the librarian to contribute. I’ve seen examples of that in my research.
But when you don’t have a senior leader like that, finding an ally in middle management may be the best — or only — way to go. I like to think that in healthy organizations, power will be distributed sufficiently that a library manager and the manager of a group that needs an embedded librarian can make it happen without having to get senior approval. Then, they get the opportunity to prove the concept before publicizing it widely.
How I spent my summer “vacation” — well, it wasn’t a vacation, but it was an incredibly busy and productive time.
One of the great opportunities I had was to present a paper, “Librarians in the Intelligence Process”, at the “Understanding and Improving Intelligence Analysis” workshop, hosted by the Center for Intelligence and Security Studies at the University of Mississippi.
The paper was a collaboration with two incredible leaders in librarianship, author and speaker Ran Hock (The Extreme Searcher’s Internet Handbook), and Fedlink Executive Director Blane Dessy.
The presentation is posted on Slideshare at http://wp.me/p5xhJ-8B
I’ve just uploaded to Slideshare the presentation I gave at the SLA Conference last month. It’s entitled, “Collaborate! (Is There Any Other Way?)” and you can find it at http://www.slideshare.net/davidshumaker/sla-panel-oncollaboration11june2013shumaker .
Hope you find it helpful. Comments welcome!
In recent weeks, I’ve learned of two new books on embedded librarianship. I haven’t read them yet, but I plan to do so.
The first is Developing Community-Led Public Libraries, by John Pateman and Ken Williment (http://bit.ly/12yDccC ) In categorizing it as embedded librarianship, I’m probably inferring a relationship the authors didn’t intend. They don’t use the word “embedded” in any of the snippets I’ve read so far. Still, their emphasis on relationships and on partnering with members of the community link up well with the core principles of embedded librarianship. In their introduction, Pateman and Williment write, “Since a community-led approach is based upon the development of relationships with individuals from various communities, by initially focusing on a geographical community or specific community of interest (for example, seniors, people with disabilities, etc.), it provides a library system with a viable and practical introduction to using community-led services.” and “Once needs have been identified and prioritized they can be met by using a community development approach. This is very different from an outreach approach which simply takes library services (which have been designed, planned, delivered and evaluated by library staff) out of the library and into community settings. A community development approach is based on creating meaningful and sustained relationships with local communities, while acknowledging that the community is the expert on its members’ own needs. Library staff become listeners rather than tellers, and staff and community co-produce library services.”
The second is Embedding Librarianship in Learning Management Systems: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians, by Beth Tumbleson and John Burke (http://www.alastore.ala.org/detail.aspx?ID=4266 ) The authors draw on their own experience as academic librarians, as well as a survey of embedded academic librarians. Starting from the premise that information literacy instruction works best when integrated (or embedded) with actual research problems.
I’m excited to see both of these additions to the literature, and look forward to reading them.