Presentation to SLA Virginia Chapter

December 6, 2012 by

The Special Libraries Association Virginia Chapter held its Fall program last Friday at the Virginia Historical Society in Richmond, VA. The topic was Embedded Librarianship, and the speakers were:

  • Shannon Jones, Associate Director for Research and Education at the Tompkins-McCaw Health Sciences Library, Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Jill Stover Heinze, Account Director, Competiscan

and me.

I learned a lot from the other speakers and I hope they’ll be sharing their experiences more widely. Meanwhile, my slides are on Slideshare at: http://www.slideshare.net/davidshumaker/embedded-librarianship-a-breakout-strategy-for-your-future .

Para-librarians and Embedded Librarians, Part 2

November 21, 2012 by

At the end of part 1, I promised to discuss benefits as well as a potential conflict that can emerge as both librarians and paralibrarians assume new roles and responsibilities in the library.

Let’s talk about the trend of replacing librarians with paralibrarians at the reference desk, or of merging reference and circulation desks into a single service desk or information desk in the library.

I think this is a good thing, because I think reference librarians have been largely misused and underemployed at the reference desk.

In a recent article (Arnason & Riemer 2012), the authors categorized over 6,000 public library service interactions. They found that only 25% involved finding information and materials at all. Technology help was the leading category with 31%, with circulation, membership (card status), directional, and procedural questions also accounting for significant percentages. Of the 25% that were information questions, the proportion representing complex research, as opposed to finding known items and basic information, isn’t known. Still the overall impression is that a substantial majority of the requests don’t require an advanced knowledge of resources and search techniques.

The same authors also quote another study (Ryan 2008) that concluded that 89% of interactions analyzed could be handled by staff without Master’s degrees or equivalent knowledge.

I have substantial, empirical, albeit unsystematic, evidence to support this view. Every time I teach our “Information Sources and Services” course, I send students out to visit a library of any type, observe the reference / service operation, and interview a public services manager or reference librarian. With few exceptions, the students report that the predominant service interactions fall into the categories mentioned above. Infrequently do they happen to observe a complex information request or an in-depth interview.

So it seems to me that it makes a lot of sense to redeploy librarians while maintaining essential services with well-trained, service-oriented paralibrarians.

Unfortunately, sometimes negative reactions to this change take hold among both librarians and paralibrarians. The librarians may feel they are being forced out in a short-sighted cost-cutting maneuver, while paralibrarian may feel they’re being asked to do the work of librarians without equitable pay and status.

If the change is made without a positive vision, then the conditions are created for these reactions to flourish. However, I think the embedded model provides a vision of better utilization of all staff, librarians and paralibrarians alike. The embedded role offers librarians the opportunity to fully apply the information retrieval, analysis, and management skills they went to school for, while affording the paralibrarians the opportunity to really take charge of the front line service operation.

Seems like a win for everybody… including the folks who need the information and the capabilities that librarians and paralibrarians bring to the organization!

Reference: Arnason, H., Reimer, L. (2012) Analyzing Public Library Service Interactions to Improve Public Library Customer Service and Technology Systems. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(1), 22-40.

p.s. In part 3, I’ll offer some thoughts in response to the question, “but what will happen to the complex questions that library users do bring to the reference/information desk?”

New Book: Call for Proposals

November 17, 2012 by

The following Call for Proposals may be of interest. It’s great to see the growing interest in embedded librarianship!

———–

Elizabeth Leonard, Director of the Online Campus Library at Berkeley College, is editing a book on the role of embedded librarianship in the online/distance academic environment. 

Book proposals should focus on giving librarians the skills they need to become successfully “embedded” in online courses. You will show what works and what doesn’t through case studies and/or an in-depth discussion of the issues. 

Topical areas can include: 

·        Embedded Librarianship: Why/how did it develop? What does it “look” like in the online environment? How is it different than a physically embedded librarian?

·        What are the educational theories underlying embedded librarianship- for example the flipped classroom or life-long learning?

·        How does meeting ACRL Information Literacy standards work in an online classroom? Is it effective?

·        How can you market embedded librarian services in an online environment?

·        By which methodologies can a librarian be embedded in an online environment?

·        How can the embedded librarian assess the effectiveness  of assessment? How can we show the positive outcome of our work, satisfy Accreditation, map to IL standards, etc)

·        Case studies (differing models- small liberal arts, large for-profit, state consortium, etc).

To submit book chapter proposals, please submit an abstract of approximately 250 words and a brief outline to Elizabeth Leonard at embeddedonlinebook@gmail.com.  Deadline for discussion and/or proposals is December 14, 2012.

 

 

Assisting Research vs. Research Assistance — A Comment

November 6, 2012 by

A couple days ago, I posted a comment on a Library Journal blog entry by Wayne Bivens-Tatum, entitled “Assisting Research vs. Research Assistance. It may be of interest to readers of this blog. You can read it at: http://ow.ly/dPEKy .

Para-Librarians and Embedded Librarians – Part 1

October 30, 2012 by

Last week, I had the opportunity to attend a meeting of Fedlink, the umbrella organization of libraries and librarians in the U.S. Federal government.

One of the sessions was devoted to discussion of the role of so-called “paraprofessionals” – individuals who work in libraries, whose jobs don’t require Library Science degrees and are generally lower-paid. One of the points of the meeting was that so-called “paraprofessionals” are indeed “professionals” at what they do.

Indeed, that term “paraprofessional” is odd. In the legal profession, there are paralegals. In the medical profession, there are paramedics. So why do we not use the term paralibrarians? It turns out that “paralibrarian” isn’t a brand new word. In fact, it first appeared in print almost exactly 20 years ago, in an editorial by John Berry in the Nov. 1, 1992 Library Journal. Still, a quick search indicates that “paraprofessional” shows up in the literature of librarianship about 100 times more often than “paralibrarian.”

Despite having the numbers against me, I’m going to adopt the term “paralibrarian.”

So, having said all that, the meeting got me thinking about the role of paralibrarians in an organization that is developing an embedded librarianship model. Of course, local circumstances will vary, but it seems to me that one important change that’s likely to occur is that paralibrarians will end up assuming greater responsibility for running that physical space we call the library.

For example, in a university I studied in my research, as librarians have spent more of their time away from the library, teaching classes and working with faculty – and as the library collection has evolved from heavily print to heavily digital – paralibrarians have transitioned from handling routine acquisitions, materials processing, and collection management tasks to providing information and assistance at a single-service desk in the library. They have picked up the slack for librarians who could no longer staff the reference desk because of their new responsibilities.

It seems to me that this is a good situation for everybody. As the nature of collections changes, and library spaces are repurposed from organized book warehouses to flexible learning spaces, the need for some types of traditional library jobs goes away. You don’t need as many serials staff to check in journal issues, for example, when 90% of your current subscriptions are digital. The growth areas are in technology and in more sophisticated forms of working with members of the community – yet the need for basic help and information services doesn’t go away. In the example I mentioned above, deploying paralibrarians to provide that help opens up new opportunities for them, while enabling librarians to focus on embedded roles.

In part 2, I’ll focus on more benefits and at least one potential conflict that can arise as librarians and paralibrarians assume these new roles.

The Embedded Librarian’s Cookbook

October 16, 2012 by

I received the following yesterday and thought it would be of interest to many readers of this blog. I’m re-posting it with the editors’ permission. (You’ll note, by the way, that they are also the editors of “Embedded Librarians: Moving Beyond One-Shot Instruction,” published by ACRL in 2011.)

———-
Call for proposals: The Embedded Librarian’s Cookbook

Are you a fan of the Library Instruction Cookbook? Trying innovative methods to embed in projects and courses? We need your gourmet recipes for embedded instruction and reference. Contribute your recipe to the next cookbook in the series from ACRL, The Embedded Librarian’s Cookbook: Recipes for making long-term connections.

Ground Rules
1. Your submission must describe a project or a method for embedding library instruction or reference.

2. Your recipe should include as much of the following as possible:
Title
Your Name, University or other affiliation, and E-mail
Potential Cookbook Category
Setting
Goal/Purpose of the project or method
Main Ingredients (Equipment, supplies, etc)
Preparation (before the project starts)
Technique
Subject/Discipline addressed
Length of project
Audience/Class size
ALA Information Literacy Standards (or other standards) Addressed
Cautions
Reaction/Reflection
Instructional Resources

3. If your submission gets chosen you need to include an image of your project/method in action.

4. Creativity is encouraged!

5. We need 2-5 page chapters about embedded activities in many Cookbook Categories. Following are some ideas to get you thinking:
First Year Experience
In the disciplines
Online courses (synchronous or asynchronous)
Learning management systems
Professional Programs
Graduate Programs
K-12 Programs
Outside the Library (residential life, student services, extension, continuing educaton)
Assessing embedded projects
Learning objects
Faculty collaborations and/or trainings
Scholarly communication

6. E-mail us if you have questions and use the original Library Instruction Cookbook (ACRL 2009) as a guide for format and tone.

7. E-mail your draft recipes by January 15, 2013 to Kaijsa Calkins (kcalkins@uwyo.edu) and Cass Kvenild (ckvenild@uwyo.edu), co-editors of Embedded Librarians: Moving Beyond One-shot Instruction (ACRL 2010) and this forthcoming Embedded Cookbook.

Colloquium at the Catholic University of America

September 29, 2012 by

Last Monday, Sept. 24, I gave a colloquium presentation at my home institution, the Catholic University of America. In it, I explored themes from part 1 of my book, “The Embedded Librarian”, and went beyond them in discussing the reasons why embedded librarianship is growing and succeeding. The slides are available on Slideshare at http://www.slideshare.net/davidshumaker/cuaslis-colloquium-sept2012 and the recording is  on YouTube at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ8i7lkW2CA&feature=youtu.be .

Please let me know if you have comments!

 

Remarks to the Big Fun Future Meeting (Long)

September 22, 2012 by

Last month, I was invited to participate via Skype in a staff development meeting organized by several public library systems in the Chicago area. The title of the meeting was the “Big Fun Future (BFF)” Meeting, and I tried to focus my comments on the opportunities for public libraries to apply the principles of embedded librarianship in their communities.

The file is a bit long (1500 words) but here goes.

Hope you like it!

Remarks to the Big Fun Future meeting
Chicago-area public library staff
Aug. 17, 2012
By David Shumaker

1. Introduction
Thanks for inviting me to be a part of your Big Fun Future meeting today. I love the title you’ve chosen for your meeting. Sometimes the future can seem a bit scary, but I’m with you: there are some really big, fun, and exciting opportunities out there – we just have to figure out how to take advantage of them. I hope my remarks today will help you to do that. I understand that we have about 20 minutes together. I plan to speak for about 10 or 12, so that we can have some questions at the end.

2. Roles before Competencies
I understand that your focus today is on skills and competencies, and I’ve been asked to speak on skills for embedded librarianship. But to identify the skills we’ll need, we have to figure out what roles and tasks we’ll be called on to perform, so I hope you’ll forgive me for starting my remarks with the question, what’s our job going to be?

It’s nothing new to say that we are living through the greatest information revolution in the last 500 years. Libraries are directly in the path of this revolution. Our fundamental ideas about how we do our job are being called into question.

So, how’s this revolution affecting your job? I’m guessing that for many of you, your experience is similar to what my students observe. I teach a course called Information Sources and Services. It’s an introduction to basic reference and public services. The first assignment requires students to go out and observe service operations at a library, and talk to one of the librarians. Of course, many of them go to public libraries. Almost always, they report that they see very few of the classic subject requests and reference interviews that we like to teach in class. Instead, the overwhelming majority of service interactions are directional or related to computer technical support.

Meanwhile, most of the information-seeking and use that formerly took place in libraries are now taking place away from libraries. Library resources and the open web are available anywhere, any time. So, what does this mean for expert library information help? Do we just let it go? I hope not. Do we rely on virtual reference? I don’t think so – virtual reference is ok, but it’s not sufficient.

3. Embedded Librarianship

This is where embedded librarianship comes in. Embedded librarianship connects librarians to their communities more closely than ever before. It gives us the chance to do more and become more valuable than ever. It can be a big part of the Fun Future.

Let me illustrate with three examples:

In Columbus, Ohio, Library Director Patrick Losinski is focusing on “community outcomes.” He has led the public library into a partnership called “Learn for Life” in which a variety of community institutions — government and non-government – have come together to address three key educational needs:
• Kindergarten readiness
• 8th-grade math skills
• College readiness

Here in Washington, DC, the public library teen services coordinator, Rebecca Renard, has formed an alliance with another community organization, Radio Rootz, to enable teens to provide knowledge to the teen community – and develop their own information literacy skills in the process. It came about because the teens said they needed better information about events, activities, and issues relevant to them. The partnership was set up to address this gap. It’s called youth202.org. (202 is for the District of Columbia area code.)The librarian and Radio Rootz supervise teen reporters, who develop stories that are broadcast on Radio Rootz on an iTunes station. They’re also posted on the youth202.org website and Twitter feed.

In Colorado, the Douglas County Library staff use the term “community reference” as well as “embedded librarianship” to refer to their initiatives. An article in the May/June American Libraries says this about what they are doing:

“Community reference involves sending librarians out into the community to work closely with groups and conduct onsite reference interviews, as needed, to discover and answer their questions. This process helps [the] librarians stay informed on the needs, goals, and direction of the community, allowing [them] to showcase [their] skills and services in a new way.” (Galston 2012)

So, there are three examples that illustrate a range of embedded librarianship initiatives in public libraries. You’ll notice that these initiatives involve the librarians getting out of the library, and into the community. But even more important than the physical change in where they work, there are common threads in how the librarians work. They are:
• Establishing relationships with a group (or groups) in your community.
• Understanding the group, its values, culture, and goals.
• Committing to shared goals with that group – goals that you the librarian share equally with the other members of your group.
• Contributing to the group by applying your unique skills and insights as a librarian, and thereby participating in achieving the group’s goals.
4. Skills for Embedded Librarianship
Let’s recap for a moment. I’m saying that the information revolution has fundamentally changed how our libraries will serve our communities. More and more, we will leave the traditional reference desk and the traditional reference interview and work in partnership with other organizations. I’m saying that this change to embedded librarianship will increase our role and our visibility in the community.

Now let’s get to skills and competencies. Clearly we need some changes in order to realize this vision. I’d like to make four points here:

1. Our strengths in information organization, knowledge of information resources, and human information behavior are our base and will be more important than ever.

2. New personal competencies for relationship-building and collaboration are essential.

3. Solve problems, don’t answer questions.

4. Focus on analysis and answers, not access.

Let’s take each of these in turn.

First, some skills don’t change fundamentally. Organizing information, finding information, and helping people use information effectively are in our DNA as librarians. We’ll be using new tools to accomplish these jobs, so we need to stay up with them, and be committed to continuous learning – but these fundamental principles will remain our unique skill set in any context we work in.

Second, we need to make sure we have good personal skills for relationship building and collaboration. Libraries as organizations, and librarians as individuals, have not always been effective at connecting and collaborating in the past. The ability to do these things will be essential in the future. This means both at an interpersonal level, and also deepening the relationship by understanding the work of the team we are working with. We have to be librarians who also understand something about economic development, or learning theory, or social needs in our community – or whatever our team is addressing. And by the way, these are learnable skills. They are not a matter of personality or whether you are an extrovert or introvert. Everyone can do this.

Third, we really can’t take the old notion of library service with us into our embedded future. According to the old notion, good service was basically limited to being friendly and providing an accurate answer. We never found out if our answer really solved the questioner’s problem or not. We have to take responsibility for solving the larger problems that trigger information needs. That’s what Patrick Losinski’s “community outcomes” idea is all about. That’s what collaboration is all about –shared goals, and that we are responsible to one another for achieving them.

Finally, our old notion that our job is to provide information access is far too confining for the embedded future. Librarians often shy away from analysis. We feel we are not supposed to interpret information for our library users. And I understand the reasons for that. But, in the embedded model, that changes. We must be information analysts, with the ability to retrieve, understand, analyze, and synthesize information in order to provide the answers that will contribute to our team’s success. If we stop short of this, we will not be adding the kind of value that we need to add.

5. Conclusion
So, in these past 10 minutes or so, I hope you’ve gained some new insights into the forces motivating change in our library services, and how embedded librarianship can be an important part of that change. I hope you’ve gained some insights into the nature of embedded librarianship and how it offers us new opportunities. And finally, I hope you’ve seen that this new way of working calls for a mixture of strengthening our traditional skill set and developing some new skills and attitudes at the same time.

If these ideas appeal to you, and you want to know more, I’d invite you to start with my blog at http://www.embeddedlibrarian.com, and may be take a look at my book, The Embedded Librarian.

And now, in this brief summary there are many, many issues I haven’t even touched on – so I bet you’d like to ask some questions.

References
1. Fialkoff, F. (2012). Moving to outcomes. Library Journal, 137(1), p. 8.
2. Renard, R. (2012). Youth202: An experiment in teen-driven knowledge management at an urban American public library. Paper presented at the IFLA Conference, Helsinki, 2012. Helsinki: IFLA. Available: http://conference.ifla.org/sites/default/files/files/papers/wlic2012/141-renard-en.pdf .
3. Galston, C., Huber, E. K., Johnson, K., & Long, A. (2012, May-June). Community reference: Making libraries indispensable in a new way. American Libraries, p. 47-50.

An Interesting New Blog

September 7, 2012 by

My friend Brandy King has alerted me to a very interesting new blog. Written by Sally Gore, it’s the story of her new role as an informationist (the term used for embedded librarians in the health sciences field) in a research project at the University of Massachusetts. It’s at http://librarianhats.wordpress.com/about/ . I’m looking forward to following Sally’s experiences in her exciting new project!

Good Advice on Communicating with Executives

September 2, 2012 by

Continuing the theme from my previous post, I wanted to share a link I got recently from Slideshare, “5 Tips for Presenting to Executives.” It nicely captures some lessons I learned the hard way. I hope these insights will help you if you’re trying to persuade the powers-that-be in your organization to let you explore embedded librarianship.

It’s at  http://blog.slideshare.net/2012/08/14/5-tips-for-presenting-to-executives/ .


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 130 other followers